Den Celltower`s rental prices can vary considerably from site to site. As mentioned above, the rental costs of a single mobile operator can exceed $150,000 in a single year for some homeowners, compared to just over $200 per month in other locations. This type of rental is used when a carrier wishes to use the mobile phone mast and ground space on an existing mobile phone mast already owned by another mobile operator or tower company. This type of leasing of the tower usually does not concern the principal owner of the land, unless the owner of the land is also the tower company or the developer. In some situations, mobile operators will not consider the implementation of a cell tower at all, but will only consider the use of a small cell associated with a dark optical fiber network. While small cell leases can still be well paid, the typical amount is much smaller than what landowners would get for a large traditional cell tower. This is a typical rental agreement between a mobile operator and a property owner. The contract to lease the mobile mast determines the amount of land provided for the construction of the cell site and the contract allows the mobile operator to access and leave the rental area. Due to our daily schedules, it can be difficult to set aside the time needed for research to assess the economic value of a mobile phone tower or dachant antenna. There are several types of cell tower leasing to consider and each of them is worth a different amount of rental fees to property owners. This puts mobile operators and tower companies in a difficult situation, as delays in connecting to the internet end up leading to profitable businesses for their customers and, as such, these companies are literally vying to expand their network bandwidth to offset this high demand. These structures are generally located on real estate owned by either an individual or an organization and, as such, the carrier must enter into a lease agreement to install its transmission equipment on existing structures.
In dense urban areas, where there is no land available for a traditional tower or where there are very few roofs available, mobile phone rents will obviously be higher. For example, a city like San Francisco has some of the highest mobile phone rents in the country. On average, property owners in the city of San Francisco can count on mobile tower rental rates of about $3,000 a month, almost double what you could get in a city like Los Angeles. The advent of small cell technology is beginning to influence the land rental rates of the cell tower. Small cells, such as microcells and femtoscopic cells, are beginning to become a more advantageous option for mobile operators, as they are more efficient, less expensive and a little easier to implement in a multitude of locations, especially in urban areas, where freed spaces are becoming scarcer by the day. Mobile roof rental is particularly popular in places with high population density, such as cities, busy suburbs or other places with the need for large bandwidth capacity. Many large buildings (think small skyscrapers) are now using roof rents for additional income, and as capacity requirements continue, it is likely that the number of roof rentals will continue to increase. As with a co-location leasing, a mobile phone leasing on the roof is the method used when the carrier does not own the structure in which it wishes to install its transmission equipment.
As such, the promoter must enter into a mobile phone contract with the owner of the structure so that he can obtain permission to install m telephony antennas